4.7 Article

Radiation-induced segregation on defect clusters in single-phase concentrated solid-solution alloys

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 98-107

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.019

关键词

Radiation induced segregation; Single-phase concentrated solid -solution alloys; High-entropy alloys; Electron energy loss spectroscopy; Molecular static simulations

资金

  1. Energy Dissipation to Defect Evolution (EDDE) Center
  2. Energy Frontier Research Center-US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A group of single-phase concentrated solid-solution alloys (SP-CSAs), including NiFe, NiCoFe, NiCoFeCr, as well as a high entropy alloy NiCoFeCrMn, was irradiated with 3 MeV Ni2+ ions at 773 K to a fluence of 5 x 10(16) ions/cm(2) for the study of radiation response with increasing compositional complexity. Advanced transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) was used to characterize the dislocation loop distribution and radiation-induced segregation (RIS) on defect clusters in the SP-CSAs. The results show that a higher fraction of faulted loops exists in the more compositionally complex alloys, which indicate that increasing compositional complexity can extend the incubation period and delay loop growth. The RIS behaviors of each element in the SP-CSAs were observed as follows: Ni and Co tend to enrich, but Cr, Fe and Mn prefer to deplete near the defect clusters. RIS level can be significantly suppressed by increasing compositional complexity due to the sluggish atom diffusion. According to molecular static (MS) simulations, disk like segregations may form near the faulted dislocation loops in the SP-CSAs. Segregated elements tend to distribute around the whole faulted loop as a disk rather than only around the edge of the loop. (C) 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据