4.5 Article

Effect of bovine oviductal extracellular vesicles on embryo development and quality in vitro

期刊

REPRODUCTION
卷 153, 期 4, 页码 461-470

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/REP-16-0384

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2012-37510, AGL2015-70140-R, AGL2015-66145- R, AGL2014-58739-R, RYC-2012-10193]
  2. FPI scholarship [BES-2010-031873]
  3. [BFU2014-55478-R]
  4. [RYC2012-11025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of extracellular vesicles (EV) from oviductal fluid (OF), either from the ampulla or isthmus, on the development and quality of in vitro-cultured bovine embryos. Zygotes were cultured in synthetic oviduct fluid (SOF + 3 mg/mL BSA) without calf serum (C-group), in the presence of 3 x 10(5) EV/mL from ampullary or isthmic OF at either 1 x 10(4) g (10 K) or 1 x 10(5) g (100 K), and compared with SOF + 5% FCS (C+ group). OF-EV size and concentration were assessed by electron microscopy and nanotracking analysis system. Embryo development was recorded on Days 7-9, and blastocyst quality was assessed through cryotolerance and gene expression analysis. Lower blastocyst yield was observed on Day 7 in the C-and OF-EV groups (12.0-14.3%) compared with C+ (20.6%); however, these differences were compensated at Days 8 and 9 (Day 9: 28.5-30.8%). Importantly, the survival rate of blastocysts produced with isthmic 100 K OF-EV was higher than that of C+ and C-group at 72 h after vitrification and warming (80.1 vs 34.5 and 50.5% respectively, P < 0.05). In terms of gene expression, blastocysts produced in the presence of 100 K isthmic OF-EV upregulated the water channel AQP3 and DNMT3A and SNRPN transcripts compared with the C+, with the expression in C-being intermediate. The lipid receptor LDLR was downregulated in C+ compared with all other groups. In conclusion, the addition of oviductal fluid extracellular vesicles from isthmus, to in vitro culture of bovine embryos in the absence of serum improves the development and quality of the embryos produced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据