4.7 Article

Multimode Hybrid Geometric Calibration of Spaceborne SAR Considering Atmospheric Propagation Delay

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs9050464

关键词

spaceborne SAR; geometric calibration; atmospheric propagation delay; tropospheric delay; ionospheric delay

资金

  1. Key research and development program of Ministry of science and technology [2016YFB0500801]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91538106, 41501503, 41601490, 41501383]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M582276]
  4. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2015CFB330]
  5. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing [15E02]
  6. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geo-information Engineering [SKLGIE2015-Z-3-1]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University [2042016kf0163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The atmospheric propagation delay of radar signals is a systematic error that occurs in the atmospheric environment, and is a key issue in the high-precision geometric calibration of spaceborne SAR. A multimode hybrid geometric calibration method for spaceborne SAR that considers the atmospheric propagation delay is proposed in this paper. Error sources that affect the accuracy of the geometric calibration were systematically analyzed. Based on correction of the atmospheric propagation delay, a geometric calibration model for spaceborne SAR was established. The high precision geometric calibration scheme for spaceborne SAR was explored by considering the pulse-width and bandwidth of the signal. A series of experiments were carried out based on high-resolution Yaogan 13 (YG-13) SAR satellite data and ground control data. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method is effective. The plane positioning accuracy of YG-13 in stripmap mode without control points is better than 3 m, and the accuracy of the sliding spotlight mode is better than 1.5 m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据