4.7 Article

Using triangulation to assess a suite of tools to measure community severance

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 119-129

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.02.013

关键词

Community severance; Roads; Motorisedtraffic; Pedestrians; Measurement; Tools; Space syntax

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  3. Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) [EP/K037323/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/K037323/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K037323/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a lack of tools to identify and measure community severance caused by large roads and motorised traffic, despite the evidence of its negative impacts on local communities. This paper reports the development of a suite of tools to measure and value community severance, undertaken as a part of the Street Mobility and Network Accessibility research project. The tools include participatory mapping, spatial analysis, a video survey, street audits, a health and neighbourhood mobility survey, and a valuation tool based on a stated preference survey. They were tested in the area around Finchley Road, a busy arterial road in North London. The study found that Finchley Road is an unpleasant place for pedestrians due to high traffic levels, air and noise pollution, and the lack and poor quality of pedestrian crossing facilities. This has a negative impact on the mobility and accessibility of local residents and, to some extent, on their health and wellbeing. The analysis showed coherence between the findings from the different measurement tools applied individually, but also revealed interconnections between factors which contribute to severance, demonstrating that overall the suite is reliable for assessing community severance in urban areas. Overall, the paper provides a multidisciplinary approach to developing standardised methods to measure a negative impact of transport that is still relatively unknown. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据