4.4 Article

Elevated serum IgG4 levels in diagnosis and treatment response in patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis

期刊

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 903-912

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-017-3542-8

关键词

Corticosteroids; IgG4; Retroperitoneal fibrosis; Tamoxifen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (iRPF) may be a manifestation of IgG4-related disease. Measuring serum IgG4 (sIgG4) may be of value in monitoring iRPF, but this has scarcely been evaluated. It is unknown if tamoxifen (TMX) affects sIgG4 levels. We performed a prospective inception cohort study of 59 patients with untreated (re)active iRPF stratified by elevated (> 1.4 g/L) or normal sIgG4 level. Changes in sIgG4 levels following TMX initiation and, if treatment failed, during subsequent corticosteroid (CS) treatment were analyzed. The median sIgG4 level was 1.1 g/L (interquartile range (IQR) 0.4-2.2); 24 patients (40%) had elevated sIgG4 level. Patients with elevated sIgG4 tended to present with higher ESR (46 vs. 34 mm/h; P = 0.08) and more frequent locoregional lymphadenopathy adjacent to the mass (41.7 vs. 20.0%; P = 0.08). sIgG4 also correlated with ESR (rho = 0.26; P = 0.05) and serum creatinine (SC) (rho = 0.26; P = 0.04). Following TMX initiation, sIgG4 level decreased, particularly when achieving treatment success (P < 0.01). Odds ratio for TMX treatment success in patients with elevated sIgG4 level was 0.77 (95% CI 0.53-1.14; P = 0.19). After adjusting for age, sex, and SC, the odds ratio was 0.78 (95% CI 0.51-1.18; P = 0.24). ROC curve analyses of sIgG4 on a continuous scale and treatment success showed an AUC of 0.62. Treatment success and concurrent sIgG4 decrease (P < 0.01) were achieved in 78% of patients who converted to CS therapy. Patients with elevated sIgG4 level may be more inflammatory than patients with normal sIgG4 level, but this needs further study. TMX affects sIgG4 levels, but to a lesser extent than CSs. sIgG4 cannot be used as an outcome prediction tool, irrespective of which cutoff value was chosen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据