4.7 Article

Persistent homology of time-dependent functional networks constructed from coupled time series

期刊

CHAOS
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4978997

关键词

-

资金

  1. Public Health Service Grant [NS44393]
  2. Berrow foundation
  3. EPSRC
  4. MRC [EP/G037280/1]
  5. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
  6. EPSRC Fellowship [EP/K041096/1]
  7. EPSRC [EP/K041096/1, EP/G037280/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We use topological data analysis to study functional networks that we construct from time-series data from both experimental and synthetic sources. We use persistent homology with a weight rank clique filtration to gain insights into these functional networks, and we use persistence landscapes to interpret our results. Our first example uses time-series output from networks of coupled Kuramoto oscillators. Our second example consists of biological data in the form of functional magnetic resonance imaging data that were acquired from human subjects during a simple motor-learning task in which subjects were monitored for three days during a five-day period. With these examples, we demonstrate that (1) using persistent homology to study functional networks provides fascinating insights into their properties and (2) the position of the features in a filtration can sometimes play a more vital role than persistence in the interpretation of topological features, even though conventionally the latter is used to distinguish between signal and noise. We find that persistent homology can detect differences in synchronization patterns in our data sets over time, giving insight both on changes in community structure in the networks and on increased synchronization between brain regions that form loops in a functional network during motor learning. For the motor-learning data, persistence landscapes also reveal that on average the majority of changes in the network loops take place on the second of the three days of the learning process. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据