4.7 Article

Mechanism of drug release from silica-gelatin aerogel-Relationship between matrix structure and release kinetics

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 229-237

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.01.019

关键词

Aerogel structure; Drug release; Kinetics; NMR spectroscopy

资金

  1. Hungarian Science Foundation [OTKA: NK-105156]
  2. University of Debrecen [RH/751/2015]
  3. Spanish National Plan of Research [CTQ2014-56324]
  4. NEW NATIONAL EXCELLENCE PROGRAM of the Ministry of Human Capacities of Hungary
  5. EU
  6. European Regional Development Fund [GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00008]
  7. [TAMOP-4.2.4A/2-11/1-2012-0001]
  8. [TAMOP-4.2.4B/2-11/1-2012-0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specific features of a silica-gelatin aerogel (3 wt.% gelatin content) in relation to drug delivery has been studied. It was confirmed that the release of both ibuprofen (IBU) and ketoprofen (KET) is about tenfold faster from loaded silica-gelatin aerogel than from pure silica aerogel, although the two matrices are structurally very similar. The main goal of the study was to understand the mechanistic background of the striking difference between the delivery properties of these closely related porous materials. Hydrated and dispersed silica-gelatin aerogel has been characterized by NMR cryoporometry, diffusiometry and relaxometry. The pore structure of the silica aerogel remains intact when it disintegrates in water. In contrast, dispersed silica-gelatin aerogel develops a strong hydration sphere, which reshapes the pore walls and deforms the pore structure. The drug release kinetics was studied on a few minutes time scale with 1 s time resolution. Simultaneous evaluation of all relevant kinetic and structural information confirmed that strong hydration of the silica-gelatin skeleton facilitates the rapid desorption and dissolution of the drugs from the loaded aerogel. Such a driving force is not operative in pure silica aerogels. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据