4.7 Article

Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci in crops

期刊

CROP JOURNAL
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 175-184

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2016.06.003

关键词

Family-based mapping; Natural population-based mapping; Mixed linear model; MAGIC population; Meta-analysis; Genotyping by sequencing

资金

  1. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91535103, 31391632, 31200943]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2014AA10A601-5]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2012261]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution [14KJA210005]
  6. Postgraduate Research and Innovation Project in Jiangsu Province [KYLX151368]
  7. Innovative Research Team of University in Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dissecting the genetic architecture of complex traits is an ongoing challenge for geneticists. Two complementary approaches for genetic mapping, linkage mapping and association mapping have led to successful dissection of complex traits inmany crop species. Both of these methods detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) by identifying marker-trait associations, and the only fundamental difference between them is that between mapping populations, which directly determine mapping resolution and power. Based on this difference, we first summarize in this review the advances and limitations of family-based mapping and natural population-based mapping instead of linkage mapping and association mapping. We then describe statistical methods used for improving detection power and computational speed and outline emerging areas such as large-scale meta-analysis for genetic mapping in crops. In the era of next-generation sequencing, there has arisen an urgent need for proper population design, advanced statistical strategies, and precision phenotyping to fully exploit high-throughput genotyping. (C) 2016 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据