4.7 Article

Pyridoxine-resveratrol hybrids Mannich base derivatives as novel dual inhibitors of AChE and MAO-B with antioxidant and metal-chelating properties for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 305-314

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.02.016

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Pyridoxine-Resveratrol hybrids; Mannich base derivatives; AChE inhibitors; MAO-B inhibitors; Antioxidant; Metal-chelating

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [20872099]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20110181110079]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project on Key New Drug Creation and Manufacturing Program [2013ZX09301304-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of pyridoxine-resveratrol hybrids Mannich base derivatives as multifunctional agents have been designed, synthesized and evaluated for cholinesterase (ChE) and monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitory activity. To further explore the multifunctional properties of the new derivatives, their antioxidant activities and metal-chelating properties were also tested. The results showed that most of these compounds could selectively inhibit acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and MAO-B. Among them, compounds 7d and 8b exhibited the highest potency for AChE inhibition with IC50 values of 2.11 mu M and 1.56 mu M, respectively, and compound 7e exhibited the highest MAO-B inhibition with an IC50 value of 2.68 mu M. The inhibition kinetic analysis revealed that compound 7d showed a mixed-type inhibition, binding simultaneously to the CAS and PAS of AChE. Molecular modeling study was also performed to investigate the binding mode of these hybrids with MAO-B. In addition, all target compounds displayed good antioxidant and metal-chelating properties. Taken together, these preliminary findings can be a new starting point for further development of multifunctional agents for Alzheimer's disease. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据