4.7 Article

Thermal behaviour of multilayer and functionally-graded YSZ/Gd2Zr2O7 coatings

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 4048-4054

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.178

关键词

Thermal applications; Thermal properties; ZrO2 and earth-rare zirconates; Multilayers and functionally-graded coatings

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [MAT2015-67586-C3-R, IJCI-2014-49839]
  2. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia [PAID-00-15]
  3. Valencia Government [APOSTD/2016/040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zirconates with pyrochlore structure, such as Gd2Zr2O7, are new promising thermal barrier coatings because of their very low thermal conductivity and good chemical resistance against molten salts. However, their coefficient of thermal expansion is low, therefore their thermal fatigue resistance is compromised. As a solution, the combination of yttria-stabilised zirconia (YSZ) and Gd2Zr2O7 can reduce the thermal contraction mismatch between the thermal barrier coating parts. In the present study, two possible designs have been performed to combine YSZ/Gd2Zr2O7. On the one hand, a multilayer coating was obtained where YSZ layer was deposited between a Gd2Zr2O7 layer and a bond coat. On the other hand, a functionally-graded coating was designed where different layers with variable ratios of YSZ/Gd2Zr2O7 were deposited such that the composition gradually changed along the coating thickness. Multilayer and functionally-graded coatings underwent isothermal and thermally-cycled treatments in order to evaluate the oxidation, sintering effects and thermal fatigue resistance of the coatings. The YSZ/Gd2Zr2O7 multilayer coating displayed better thermal behaviour than the Gd2Zr2O7 monolayer coating but quite less thermal fatigue resistance compared to the conventional YSZ coating. However, the functionally-graded coating displays a good thermal fatigue resistance. Hence, it can be concluded that this kind of design is ideal to optimise the behaviour of thermal barrier coatings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据