4.7 Article

Salmonella Typhimurium disrupts Sirt1/AMPK checkpoint control of mTOR to impair autophagy

期刊

PLOS PATHOGENS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006227

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD) by the DFG within the Excellence Initiative of the German federal government
  2. Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD) - funded by the DFG within the Excellence Initiative of the German state government
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 670]
  4. German center for Infection Research
  5. Koln Fortune funding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During intracellular infections, autophagy significantly contributes to the elimination of pathogens, regulation of pro-inflammatory signaling, secretion of immune mediators and in coordinating the adaptive immune system. Intracellular pathogens such as S. Typhimurium have evolved mechanisms to circumvent autophagy. However, the regulatory mechanisms targeted by S. Typhimurium to modulate autophagy have not been fully resolved. Here we report that cytosolic energy loss during S. Typhimurium infection triggers transient activation of AMPK, an important checkpoint of mTOR activity and autophagy. The activation of AMPK is regulated by LKB1 in a cytosolic complex containing Sirt1 and LKB1, where Sirt1 is required for deacetylation and subsequent activation of LKB1. S. Typhimurium infection targets Sirt1, LKB1 and AMPK to lysosomes for rapid degradation resulting in the disruption of the AMPK-mediated regulation of mTOR and autophagy. The degradation of cytosolic Sirt1/LKB1/AMPK complex was not observed with two mutant strains of S. Typhimurium, Delta ssrB and.ssaV, both compromising the pathogenicity island 2 (SPI2). The results highlight virulence factor-dependent degradation of host cell proteins as a previously unrecognized strategy of S. Typhimurium to evade autophagy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据