3.8 Proceedings Paper

The Manifold Varieties of Poly(2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate) Hydrogels-IPNs

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR SYMPOSIA
卷 372, 期 1, 页码 28-42

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/masy.201700018

关键词

double network; hydrogel; interpenetrating networks; poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate); SWAXS; swelling

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [13-00939S]
  2. Charles University in Prague [SVV 260 324-2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interpenetrating network structure was used to control mechanical properties of hydrogels based on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) (first network (A) or second network (B)) and poly(glycerol methacrylate) (PGMA) (network B). In order to understand the structure, mechanical and swelling properties of sequentially made IPN hydrogels, the swollen PHEMA network microstructure and its formation was investigated by means of swelling and SWAXS experiments. Visually clear and microscopically homogenous hydrogel networks based on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) revealed presence of domains of size 1-10nm formed during polymerization in the presence of water. The study was carried out to understand conditions under which the hydrophobic interactions are operative and their effect on the microstructure as well as how they change when the double network structure is introduced. The morphologies of network A ranged from homogenous, non-porous, and optically clear gels, to macroporous gels resulting from phase separation and offering fused-sphere morphology. A cryogel characterized by large elongated and partially interconnected pores of tens to hundreds micrometers were another object for comparison. In most cases, an increase of tensile moduli and improvement of ultimate tensile properties was achieved. A surprisingly high increase in true strength (by a factor of 10 - 30) was achieved when the macroporous PHEMA network A was reinforced by weak PHEMA or PGMA networks B. All these weakly crosslinked IPN gels were optically clear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据