4.8 Article

Composition-Dependent Hot Carrier Relaxation Dynamics in Cesium Lead Halide (CsPbX3, X = Br and I) Perovskite Nanocrystals

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 56, 期 15, 页码 4160-4164

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201611916

关键词

electron densities; hot carriers; intraband relaxation; multiphonon emission; perovskites

资金

  1. MSIP (Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning), Korea, under the ICT Consilience Creative Program [IITP-R0346-16-1008]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Korea government (MSIP) [2016R1C1B1009709]
  3. Industrial Technology Innovation Program of MOTIE [10062161]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10062161] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1C1B1009709] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cesium-based perovskite nanocrystals (NCs) have outstanding photophysical properties improving the performances of lighting devices. Fundamental studies on excitonic properties and hot-carrier dynamics in perovskite NCs further suggest that these materials show higher efficiencies compared to the bulk form of perovskites. However, the relaxation rates and pathways of hot-carriers are still being elucidated. By using ultrafast transient spectroscopy and calculating electronic band structures, we investigated the dependence of halide in Cs-based perovskite (CsPbX3 with X = Br, I, or their mixtures) NCs on the hot-carrier relaxation processes. All samples exhibit ultrafast (< 0.6 ps) hot-carrier relaxation dynamics with following order: CsPbBr3 (310 fs) > CsPbBr1.5I1.5 (380 fs) > CsPbI3 NC (580 fs). These result accounts for a reduced light emission efficiency of CsPbI3 NC compared to CsPbBr3 NC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据