4.8 Article

Clock Regulation of Metabolites Reveals Coupling between Transcription and Metabolism

期刊

CELL METABOLISM
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 961-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [5R01NS054794-08]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [DARPA-D12AP00025]
  3. TAPITMAT award via the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [5UL1TR000003]
  4. National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the NIH [K99CA204593, R01CA057341]
  5. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society [LLS 6106-14]
  6. Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute
  7. National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidneys Diseases [R01DK098656]
  8. National Institute on Aging [R01AG043483]
  9. Penn Genome Frontiers Institute under an HRFF
  10. Pennsylvania Department of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intricate connection between the circadian clock and metabolism remains poorly understood. We used high temporal resolution metabolite profiling to explore clock regulation of mouse liver and cell-autonomous metabolism. In liver, similar to 50% of metabolites were circadian, with enrichment of nucleotide, amino acid, and methylation pathways. In U2 OS cells, 28% were circadian, including amino acids and NAD biosynthesis metabolites. Eighteen metabolites oscillated in both systems and a subset of these in primary hepatocytes. These 18 metabolites were enriched in methylation and amino acid pathways. To assess clock dependence of these rhythms, we used genetic perturbation. BMAL1 knockdown diminished metabolite rhythms, while CRY1 or CRY2 perturbation generally shortened or lengthened rhythms, respectively. Surprisingly, CRY1 knockdown induced 8 hr rhythms in amino acid, methylation, and vitamin metabolites, decoupling metabolite from transcriptional rhythms, with potential impact on nutrient sensing in vivo. These results provide the first comprehensive views of circadian liver and cell-autonomous metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据