4.6 Article

RhoGEF9 splice isoforms influence neuronal maturation and synapse formation downstream of α2 GABAA receptors

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007073

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center for Competence in Research (NCCR-Neuro)
  2. Hartmann Muller Stiftung
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [41603-07-01, 310030_146120]
  4. ERC-AdG [341116]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [341116] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_146120] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In developing brain neuronal migration, dendrite outgrowth and dendritic spine outgrowth are controlled by Cdc42, a small GTPase of the Rho family, and its activators. Cdc42 function in promoting actin polymerization is crucial for glutamatergic synapse regulation. Here, we focus on GABAergic synapse-specific activator of Cdc42, collybistin ( CB) and examine functional differences between its splice isoforms CB1 and CB2. We report that CB1 and CB2 differentially regulate GABAergic synapse formation in vitro along proximal-distal axis and adult-born neuron maturation in vivo. The functional specialization between CB1 and CB2 isoforms arises from their differential protein half-life, in turn regulated by ubiquitin conjugation of the unique CB1 C-terminus. We report that CB1 and CB2 negatively regulate Cdc42; however, Cdc42 activation is dependent on CB interaction with gephyrin. During hippocampal adult neurogenesis CB1 regulates neuronal migration, while CB2 is essential for dendrite outgrowth. Finally, using mice lacking Gabra2 subunit, we show that CB1 function is downstream of GABA(A)Rs, and we can rescue adult neurogenesis deficit observed in Gabra2 KO. Overall, our results uncover previously unexpected role for CB isoforms downstream of alpha 2-containing GABA(A)Rs during neuron maturation in a Cdc42 dependent mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据