4.8 Article

RRDE experiments on noble-metal and noble-metal-free catalysts: Impact of loading on the activity and selectivity of oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline solution

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 115-126

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.001

关键词

Oxygen reduction reaction; Rotating ring-disk electrode; Catalyst loading; Hydrogen peroxide selectivity; Electron transfer number

资金

  1. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Nature et Technologies (FRQNT)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS)
  4. Centre Quebecois sur les Materiaux Fonctionnels (CQMF)
  5. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  6. FRQNT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is at the core of various applications, such as fuel cells, metal-air batteries and H2O2 electro-generation. Depending on the targeted application, catalysts that follow a direct four-electron (4e(-)) pathway or two-electron (2e(-)) pathway are envisaged. We have systematically investigated the impact of the electrocatalyst loading on the rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE), on their activity and selectivity towards ORR in alkaline medium (0.1 M and 1M KOH). Four representative catalysts, including a noble metal catalyst (commercial 20 wt% Pt/C, ETEK), metal-free catalysts (Printex carbon black and graphene), and non-noble metal catalyst (Fe/N/C), were selected because they exhibit different behaviours for ORR following a direct four-electron (4e-) pathway, two-electron (2e-) pathway, or a series 2e(-) + 2e(-) pathway. The results confirmed that the catalyst loading influences the activity and the selectivity of the catalysts, with lower loadings favoring the H2O2 electrogeneration, and researchers should pay attention to it. Moreover, in order to make possible comparison between results coming from different research groups, we recommend reasonable loading ranges for each type of catalyst. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据