4.6 Article

Loss of the chromatin modifier Kdm2aa causes Braf V600E -independent spontaneous melanoma in zebrafish

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006959

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute [WT098051]
  2. National Institute of Health grant [1R01DK093399-01A1]
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1102/2]
  4. European Research Council [309952]
  5. European Research Council Consolidator Award
  6. L'Oreal-Melanoma Research Alliance Team Science Award
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [309952] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_U127585840, MC_UP_1102/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. MRC [MC_UP_1102/2, MC_PC_U127585840] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

KDM2A is a histone demethylase associated with transcriptional silencing, however very little is known about its in vivo role in development and disease. Here we demonstrate that loss of the orthologue kdm2aa in zebrafish causes widespread transcriptional disruption and leads to spontaneous melanomas at a high frequency. Fish homozygous for two independent premature stop codon alleles show reduced growth and survival, a strong male sex bias, and homozygous females exhibit a progressive oogenesis defect. kdm2aa mutant fish also develop melanomas from early adulthood onwards which are independent from mutations in braf and other common oncogenes and tumour suppressors as revealed by deep whole exome sequencing. In addition to effects on translation and DNA replication gene expression, high-replicate RNA-seq in morphologically normal individuals demonstrates a stable regulatory response of epigenetic modifiers and the specific de-repression of a group of zinc finger genes residing in constitutive heterochromatin. Together our data reveal a complex role for Kdm2aa in regulating normal mRNA levels and carcinogenesis. These findings establish kdm2aa mutants as the first single gene knockout model of melanoma biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据