4.6 Article

Karst paleogeomorphology of the fourth Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area, Sichuan Basin, SW China: Restoration and geological significance

期刊

PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 58-68

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1876-3804(17)30008-3

关键词

paleogeomorphology; karst platform; slope; superimposed slope; Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation; Sinian Dengying Formation; Moxi-Gaoshiti area; Sichuan Basin

资金

  1. China National Technological Projects [2016ZX05004002-001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41402126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on 3-D seismic data and drill-hole data in Moxi-Gaoshiti area, the impression seismic thickness from the top of Longwangmiao Formation, which is easier traced, to the bottom of Cambrian System was selected to characterize the karst paleogeomorphology of the fourth Member of Dengying Formation. The paleogeomorphology of the member can be further divided into three geomorphic units: karst platform, slope and superimposed slope, which had different paleohydrologic conditions, and thus different karstification intensity and reservoir quality. Among them, the superimposed slope with the strongest dissolution, has larger solution groove and cave systems, where the reservoirs with mainly honeycombed dissolved pores and cavities as storage space, are best in quality; the platform slope with weaker dissolution, has smaller solution groove and cave systems, where the reservoirs are poorer than those in the superimposed slope; the karst platform with the weakest dissolution, has piebald karst systems mainly, where the reservoirs with mainly pinhole to smaller dissolved pores and cavities as storage space, are poorer in quality on the whole, but there are some good quality reservoir bodies in local areas. The results show that, besides the highly explored scarp belt, the slope in the intra-platform with low exploration degree can also be favorable exploration area of the fourth member of Dengying Formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据