4.8 Article

Efficient and Flexible Thin Film Amorphous Silicon Solar Cells on Nanotextured Polymer Substrate Using Sol-gel Based Nanoimprinting Method

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 27, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201604720

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61622407, 61474128, 21503261, 61504155]
  2. Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [14JC1492900, 16DZ1207300]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2013302]
  4. Youth Innovation Fund for Interdisciplinary Research of Shanghai Advanced Research Institute [Y526453233]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanical flexibility of substrates and controllable nanostructures are two major considerations in designing high-performance, flexible thin-film solar cells. In this work, we proposed an approach to realize highly ordered metal oxide nanopatterns on polyimide (PI) substrate based on the sol-gel chemistry and soft thermal nanoimprinting lithography. Thin-film amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) solar cells were subsequently constructed on the patterned PI flexible substrates. The periodic nanopatterns delivered broadband-enhanced light absorption and quantum efficiency, as well as the eventual power conversion efficiency (PCE). The nanotextures also benefit for the device yield and mechanical flexibility, which experienced little efficiency drop even after 100,000 bending cycles. In addition, flexible, transparent nanocone films, obtained by a template process, were attached onto the patterned PI solar cells, serving as top anti-reflection layers. The PCE performance with these dual-interfacial patterns rose up to 8.17%, that is, it improved by 48.5% over the planar device. Although the work was conducted on a-Si:H material, our proposed scheme can be extended to a variety of active materials for different optoelectronic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据