4.8 Article

Porous Nanohydroxyapatite/Collagen Scaffolds Loading Insulin PLGA Particles for Restoration of Critical Size Bone Defect

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 13, 页码 11380-11391

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b13566

关键词

insulin; composite scaffold; drug delivery system; bone tissue engineering PLGA; hydroxyapatite

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271180, 81150019]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7164297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insulin is considered to be a classical central regulator of energy homeostasis. Recently, the effect of insulin on bone has gained a lot of attention, but little attention has been paid to the application in bone tissue engineering. In this study, porous nanohydroxyapatite/collagen (nHAC) scaffolds incorporating poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) particles were successfully developed as an insulin delivery platform for bone regeneration. Bioactive insulin was successfully released from the PLGA particles within the scaffold, and the size of the particles as well as the release kinetics of the insulin could be efficiently controlled through Shirasu porous glass premix membrane emulsification technology. It was indicated that the nHAC/PLGA composite scaffolds possessed favorable mechanical and structural properties for cell adhesion and proliferation, as well as the differentiation into osteoblasts. It was also demonstrated that the nHAC/PLGA scaffolds implanted into a rabbit critical-size mandible defect possessed tissue compatibility and higher bone restoration capacity compared with the defects that were filled with or without nHAC scaffolds. Furthermore, the in vivo results showed that the nHAC/PLGA scaffolds which incorporated insulin-loaded microspheres with a size of 1.61 mu m significantly accelerated bone healing compared with two other composite scaffolds. Our study indicated that the local insulin released at the optimal time could substantially and reproducibly improve bone repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据