4.7 Article

Pseudo-Goldstone Magnons in the Frustrated S=3/2 Heisenberg Helimagnet ZnCr2Se4 with a Pyrochlore Magnetic Sublattice

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW X
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041049

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) through the Collaborative Research Center in Dresden [SFB 1143, IN 209/4-1]
  2. Transregional Collaborative Research Center (Augsburg) [TRR 80]
  3. DFG [SFB 1170]
  4. ERC [ERC-StG-Thomale-336012]
  5. Division of Scientific User Facilities, U.S. DOE Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  6. Transregional Collaborative Research Center (Munich) [TRR 80]
  7. Transregional Collaborative Research Center (Stuttgart) [TRR 80]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low-energy spin excitations in any long-range ordered magnetic system in the absence of magneto-crystalline anisotropy are gapless Goldstone modes emanating from the ordering wave vectors. In helimagnets, these modes hybridize into the so-called helimagnon excitations. Here we employ neutron spectroscopy supported by theoretical calculations to investigate the magnetic excitation spectrum of the isotropic Heisenberg helimagnet ZnCr2Se4 with a cubic spinel structure, in which spin-3/2 magnetic Cr3+ ions are arranged in a geometrically frustrated pyrochlore sublattice. Apart from the conventional Goldstone mode emanating from the (00 q(h)) ordering vector, low-energy magnetic excitations in the single-domain proper-screw spiral phase show soft helimagnon modes with a small energy gap of similar to 0.17 meV, emerging from two orthogonal wave vectors (q(h) 00) and (0 q(h) 0) where no magnetic Bragg peaks are present. We term them pseudo-Goldstone magnons, as they appear gapless within linear spin-wave theory and only acquire a finite gap due to higher-order quantum-fluctuation corrections. Our results are likely universal for a broad class of symmetric helimagnets, opening up a new way of studying weak magnon-magnon interactions with accessible spectroscopic methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据