4.5 Review

Instrumenting Wireless Sensor Networks - A survey on the metrics that matter

期刊

PERVASIVE AND MOBILE COMPUTING
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 45-62

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2016.10.001

关键词

Wireless sensor networks; Metrics; Performance

资金

  1. LOEWE Priority Program NICER
  2. LOEWE Priority Program LOEWE CASED
  3. LOEWE Priority Program BMBF/HMWK CRISP
  4. Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation
  5. DFG [CRC 1053 MAKI]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) are part of the technical fundament enabling the 'Internet of Things' (IoT), where sensing and actuator nodes instantaneously interact with the environment at large. As such they become part of everyday life and drive applications as diverse as medical monitoring, smart homes, smart environment, and smart factories, to name but a few. To acquire data, individual sensors interact with the physical environment by sensing physical phenomena in proximity. The wireless network connectivity is leveraged to collect the raw data or pre-processed events, and to disseminate code, queries or commands. Actuating capabilities facilitate instant interactions with the environment or application processes. Experience on how to operate large scale heterogeneous WSNs in (critical) real-world applications is still scarce, and operational considerations are often an afterthought to WSN deployment. A principled look into the metrics, i.e., a standard or best practice of measurement of the 'vital' parameters in WSNs is still missing. In this article, we contribute a survey on the most important metrics to characterize the performance of WSNs. We define an abstract system model for WSNs, take a look on what the WSN community considers 'metrics that matter', and categorize the metrics into scopes of relevance. We discuss the properties of the metrics as well as practical aspects on how to obtain and process them. Our survey can serve as a 'manual' for implementors and operators of WSNs in the IoT. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据