4.1 Article

Development and pilot randomized control trial of a drama program to enhance well-being among older adults

期刊

ARTS IN PSYCHOTHERAPY
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aip.2016.09.007

关键词

Successful aging; Drama instruction; Positive psychological traits; Randomized controlled trial; Community engagement

资金

  1. University of California [P3041]
  2. San Diego Frontiers of Innovation Scholars Program (FISP) [P3041]
  3. National Institutes of Health [K23 MH107260]
  4. Stein Institute for Research on Aging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Develop a novel theatre-based program and test its feasibility, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy for improving empathy, compassion and well-being among older adults. Method: Thirteen older adults were randomized to a 6-week Drama Workshop (DW) program or time equivalent Backstage Pass (BP) control condition. Pre- and post-treatment measures included empathy, compassion, and mood scales. Additional post -treatment measures included self-rated change in empathy/compassion, confidence, and affect. Participants also rated their mood/affect after each session. Results: The program was successfully completed and well-liked. No pre-to-post-treatment changes in empathy/compassion or mood symptoms were found in either group. Compared to BP, DW weekly ratings indicated higher levels of anxiety and lower happiness; however, the DW program had higher self-ratings of positive change in self-esteem, confidence, and happiness post-treatment. Discussion: The DW was not shown to promote empathy/compassion. It was also reported as personally challenging. However, engagement in dramatic exercises and rehearsing and performing a dramatic piece was reported by participants as a positive growth experience, as indicated by the post-treatment ratings of enhanced self-esteem, confidence and happiness. Thus, such a program might be useful for counteracting some of the potential negative aspects of older age, including managing physical limitations and coping with losses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据