4.7 Review

Hypertension: The role of biochemistry in the diagnosis and management

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 465, 期 -, 页码 131-143

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.12.014

关键词

Hypertension; Biochemical investigations; Secondary hypertension; Pre-analytical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypertension is defined as a persistently elevated blood pressure >= 140/90 mm Hg. It is an important treatable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, with a high prevalence in the general population. The most common cause, essential hypertension, is a widespread disease however, secondary hypertension is under investigated and under diagnosed. Collectively, hypertension is referred to as a silent killer - frequently it displays no overt symptomatology. It is a leading risk factor for death and disability globally, with >40% of persons aged over 25 having hypertension. A vast spectrum of conditions result in hypertension spanning essential through resistant, to patients with an overt endocrine cause. A significant number of patients with hypertension have multiple cardiovascular risk factors at the time of presentation. Both routine and specialised biochemical investigations are paramount for the evaluation of these patients and their subsequent management. Biochemical testing serves to identify those hypertensive individuals who are at higher risk on the basis of evidence of dysglycaemia, dyslipidaemia, renal impairment, or target organ damage and to exclude identifiable causes of hypertension. The main target of biochemical testing is the identification of patients with a specific and treatable aetiology of hypertension. Information gleaned from biochemical investigation is used to risk stratify patients and tailor the type and intensity of subsequent management and treatment We review the approach to the biochemical investigation of patients presenting with hypertension and propose a diagnostic algorithm for work-up. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据