4.7 Article

Entry and exit fows in curved pipes

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 815, 期 -, 页码 570-591

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2017.72

关键词

general fluid mechanics; mathematical foundations; Navier-Stokes equations

资金

  1. Viterbi Postdoctoral Fellowship through the Viterbi School of Engineering at the University of Southern California

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solutions are presented for both laminar developing flow in a curved pipe with a parabolic inlet velocity and laminar transitional flow downstream of a curved pipe into a straight outlet. Scalings and linearized analyses about appropriate base states are used to show that both cases obey the same governing equations and boundary conditions. In particular, the governing equations in the two cases are linearized about fully developed Poiseuille flow in cylindrical coordinates and about Dean's velocity profile for curved pipe flow in toroidal coordinates respectively. Subsequently, we identify appropriate scalings of the axial coordinate and disturbance velocities that eliminate dependence on the Reynolds number Re and dimensionless pipe curvature alpha from the governing equations and boundary conditions in the limit of small alpha and large Re. Direct numerical simulations confirm the scaling arguments and theoretical solutions for a range of Re and alpha. Maximum values of the axial velocity, secondary velocity and pressure perturbations are determined along the curved pipe section. Results collapse when the scalings are applied, and the theoretical solutions are shown to be valid up to Dean numbers of D = Re-2 alpha = O(100). The developing flows are shown numerically and analytically to contain spatial oscillations. The numerically determined decay of the velocity perturbations is also used to determine entrance/development lengths for both flows, which are shown to scale linearly with the Reynolds number, but with a prefactor similar to 60% larger than the textbook case of developing flow in a straight pipe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据