4.7 Article

Systematic and functional identification of small non-coding RNAs associated with exogenous biofuel stress in cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp PCC 6803

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0743-y

关键词

sRNA; Synechocystis; Biofuels; Tolerance

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [31470217, 21621004]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2014CB745101]
  3. National High-Tech R&D Program (863 program) [2012AA02A707]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The unicellular model cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is considered a promising microbial chassis for biofuel production. However, its low tolerance to biofuel toxicity limits its potential application. Although recent studies showed that bacterial small RNAs (sRNAs) play important roles in regulating cellular processes in response to various stresses, the role of sRNAs in resisting exogenous biofuels is yet to be determined. Results: Based on genome-wide sRNA sequencing combined with systematic analysis of previous transcriptomic and proteomic data under the same biofuel or environmental perturbations, we report the identification of 133 transencoded sRNA transcripts with high-resolution mapping of sRNAs in Synechocystis, including 23 novel sRNAs identified for the first time. In addition, according to quantitative expression analysis and sRNA regulatory network prediction, sRNAs potentially involved in biofuel tolerance were identified and functionally confirmed by constructing sRNA overexpression or suppression strains of Synechocystis. Notably, overexpression of sRNA Nc117 revealed an improved tolerance to ethanol and butanol, while suppression of Nc117 led to increased sensitivity. Conclusions: The study provided the first comprehensive responses to exogenous biofuels at the sRNA level in Synechocystis and opens an avenue to engineering sRNA regulatory elements for improved biofuel tolerance in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据