4.7 Article

Blocking preferential glucose uptake sensitizes liver tumor-initiating cells to glucose restriction and sorafenib treatment

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 388, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.11.023

关键词

Tumor-initiating cells; Nutrition stress; Glucose uptake; GLUT1/3; IL-6/STAT3; Sorafenib

类别

资金

  1. State key infection disease project of China [2012ZX10002]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [31371440]
  3. Shanghai Outstanding Academic Scholarship [16XD1403300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer cells display altered metabolic phenotypes characterized by a high level of glycolysis, even under normoxic conditions. Because of a high rate of glycolytic flux and inadequate vascularization, tumor cells often suffer from nutrient deficiency and require metabolic adaptations to address such stresses. Although tumor-initiating cells (T-ICs) have been identified in various malignancies, the cells' metabolic phenotypes remain elusive. In this study, we observed that liver T-ICs preferentially survived under restricted glucose treatment. These cell populations compete successfully for glucose uptake by preferentially expressing glucose transporters (GLUT1 and GLUT3), whereas inhibition of GLUT1 or GLUTS abolished the survival advantage and suppressed the tumorigenic potential of liver T-ICs. Among signaling pathways related to T-ICs, IL-6/STAT3 was identified to be responsible for the elevation of glucose uptake in liver T-ICs under glucose limitation. Further investigation revealed that IL-6 stimulation upregulated GLUT1 and GLUT3 expressions in CD133(+) cells, particularly during glucose deprivation. More importantly, inhibition of glucose uptake sensitized liver T-ICs to sorafenib treatment and enhanced the therapeutic efficacy in vivo. Our findings suggest that blocking IL-6/STAT3-mediated preferential glucose uptake might be exploited for novel therapeutic targets during hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据