4.7 Article

Ectopic overexpression of filamin C scaffolds MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 to promote the progression of human hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 388, 期 -, 页码 167-176

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.11.037

关键词

Metastasis; Proliferation; Apoptosis; Methylation; Microarray

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575103, 81472683, 81201871]
  2. 863 Program [2015AA020403]
  3. National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Project [2013YQ16055106]
  4. Doctoral Research Fund from the Ministry of Education of China [20111202120016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) invasion and metastasis are mediated by a complicated signal transduction network and downstream cytoskeletal and adhesion molecules. In this study, a microarray-based analysis revealed a dramatic increase in filamin C (FLNC), which is commonly expressed in muscle rather than in liver cells, in the two metastatic HCC cell lines MHCC97L and HCCLM3. Clinicopathological studies showed that increased FLNC expression was associated with microvascular invasion and poor prognosis. Specific hypomethylation was identified within the FLNC promoter region in HCC cell lines and patient tumor samples, which might contribute to the ectopic overexpression of FLNC. FLNC downregulation inhibited cell migration and impaired cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis. Mechanistic studies suggested that FLNC interacts with mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (MEK1/2) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and that FLNC downregulation inhibited MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 activation. Xenographic tumor transplantation experiments in nude mice further confirmed the role of FLNC in HCC progression and metastasis. Our results reveal a novel mechanism by which the cytoskeletal protein FLNC enhances the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway during tumorigenesis. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据