4.3 Article

The Degeneration and Apoptosis Patterns of Cone Photoreceptors in rd11 Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 2017, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2017/9721362

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81371060, 81260155, 81600771]
  2. Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China [QTJ11018]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of School of Ophthalmology and Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University [YNCX201409, KYQD130501]
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [EY023543]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau [Y20140355, Y20140352]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province, China [2012GXNSFAA053096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The retinal degeneration 11 (rd11) mouse is a new animal model with rapid photoreceptor degeneration. The long-term efficacy of gene therapy has a direct relationship with the onset of photoreceptor degeneration or apoptosis, whereas the degeneration or apoptosis patterns of photoreceptors are still unclear in rd11 mice. The distribution patterns of cone function-related L-and S-opsin were examined by immunofluorescence staining, and the apoptosis was performed by TUNEL assay in rd11 mice. The expression pattern of L-opsin or S-opsin in rd11 retina at postnatal day (P) 14 was similar to the pattern observed in wildtype retina. With increasing age, the expression of L-opsin and S-opsin, especially S-opsin, decreased significantly in rd11 mice. The degeneration of L-opsin began around the optic nerve and expanded to the periphery of the retina, from the ventral/nasal to dorsal/temporal retina, whereas the expression of S-opsin gradually decreased from the dorsal/temporal to ventral/nasal retina. Apoptotic signal appeared at P14 and was strongest at P28 of rd11 mice. The key genes associated with apoptosis confirmed those changes. These indicated that the degeneration and apoptosis of cone photoreceptors began at P14 of rd11 mice, which was a key point for gene therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据