4.5 Article

Three dimensionality in the wake of the flow around a circular cylinder at Reynolds number 5000

期刊

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 102-118

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.02.004

关键词

Direct numerical simulation; Coherent structures; Vortex shedding; Shear layer; Wake three-dimensionality; Vortex dislocations

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Secretaria de Estado de Investigacion, Desarrollo e Innovacion, Spain [ENE2014-60577-R]
  2. Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya
  3. Termo Fluids S.L.
  4. AGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya)
  5. Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion - Colciencias via their doctoral training program Francisco Jose de Caldas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The turbulent flow around a circular cylinder has been investigated at Re = 5000 using direct numerical simulations. Low frequency behavior, vortex undulation, vortex splitting, vortex dislocations and three dimensional flow within the wake were found to happen at this flow regime. In order to successfully capture the wake three dimensionality, different span-wise lengths were considered. It was found that a length Lz = 2 pi D was enough to capture this behavior, correctly predicting different aspects of the flow such as drag coefficient, Strouhal number and pressure and velocity distributions when compared to experimental values. Two instability mechanisms were found to coexist in the present case study: a global type instability originating in the shear layer, which shows a characteristic frequency, and a convective type instability that seems to be constantly present in the near wake. Characteristics of both types of instabilities are identified and discussed in detail. As suggested by Norberg, a resonance-type effect takes place in the vortex formation region, as the coexistence of both instability mechanisms result in distorted vortex tubes. However, vortex coherence is never lost within the wake. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据