4.8 Article

Intrinsic and Stable Conjugation of Thiolated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with Radioarsenic

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 6772-6781

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b14049

关键词

image-guided drug delivery; arsenic trioxide; radioarsenic; positron emission tomography; As-72; As-76; As-77; radiolabeling

资金

  1. University of Wisconsin Madison
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0005281, DE-SC0008384]
  3. National Institutes of Health [T32CA009206, 1R0-1CA169365]
  4. American Cancer Society [125246-RSG-13-099-01-CCE]
  5. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center [P30 CA014520]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0005281] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of new image-guided drug delivery tools to improve the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapeutics remains an important goal in nanomedicine. Using labeling strategies that involve radioelements that have theranostic pairs of diagnostic positron-emitting isotopes and therapeutic electron-emitting isotopes has promise in achieving this goal and further enhancing drug performance through radiotherapeutic effects. The isotopes of radioarsenic offer such theranostic potential and would allow for the use of positron emission tomography (PET) for image-guided drug delivery studies of the arsenic-based chemotherapeutic arsenic trioxide (ATO). Thiolated mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) are shown to effectively and stably bind cyclotron-produced radioarsenic. Labeling studies elucidate that this affinity is a result of specific binding between trivalent arsenic and nanoparticle thiol surface modification. Serial PET imaging of the in vivo murine biodistribution of radiolabeled Silica nanoparticles shows very good stability toward dearsenylation that is directly proportional to silica porosity. Thiolated MSNs are found to have a macroscopic arsenic loading capacity of 20 mg of ATO per gram of MSN, sufficient for delivery

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据