4.0 Article

Convolutional Neural Network Based Clustering and Manifold Learning Method for Diabetic Plantar Pressure Imaging Dataset

期刊

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jmihi.2017.2082

关键词

Diabetic Mellitus; Plantar Pressure Imaging; Convolutional Neural Network; Clustering; Parameterized Manifold Learning

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Fund [LY17F030014]
  2. Science and Research Project of Education of Zhejiang Province [FX2016102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Foot plantar pressure characteristics can be used to investigate and characterize diabetic patients. The current work proposed an effective method for analyzing plantar pressure images in order to obtain the key areas of foot plantar pressure characteristics. A collected data of plantar pressure of diabetic patients is involved to evaluate the proposed method based on image analysis. Initially, the plantar pressure imaging dataset was preprocessed by using watershed transformation to determine the region of interest (ROI) as well as to decrease the computation complexity. Afterward, the convolutional neural network (CNN) based K-mean clustering and parameterized manifold learning using an improved isometric mapping algorithm (ISOMAP) were applied to attain segments of the imaging dataset. The proposed method was discussed and was compared on ten areas of plantar including toes, mid-foots and heels. For the clustering result, the experiments established superior performance with root mean square error (RMSE) of 70%, average accuracy of 80% and 80% time consuming. Furthermore, the proposed manifold learning method achieved an average accuracy of 87.2%, which was superior to other seven algorithms including multi-dimensional scaling (MDS), principal components analysis (PCA), locally linear embedding (LLE), Hessian LLE, Laplacian eigenmap method (LE), diffusion map, and local tangent space alignment (LTSA). The proposed approach established potential application on shoe-last customization of diabetic foot.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据