4.7 Article

Comparison of metoprolol degradation by FeIII-NTA modified Fenton-like reaction in the absence and presence of manganese: Efficiency and intermediates

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 313, 期 -, 页码 769-776

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.098

关键词

Metoprolol; Fe-III-NTA; Fenton-like reaction; Hydroxyl radical; Manganese

资金

  1. Innovation Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province, Plan for Scientific Innovation Talent of Henan Province [134200510014]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20140341]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The degradation of metoprolol in aqueous solutions by traditional Fenton-like reaction (Fe-III/H2O2), and Fe-III-NTA modified Fenton-like reaction (Fe(III)NTA/H2O2) in the absence and presence of Mn-II (Fe-III-NTA/ H2O2-Mn) have been investigated. The results show that Fe-III-NTA/H2O2 is able to degrade metoprolol at initial neutral pH. In particular, the presence of Mn-II greatly improved the degradation rate of metoprolol by Fe-III-NTA/H2O2 over a wide pH range of 4.0-8.0. Under the same conditions, the degradation rate constants of metoprolol (k) obtained in Fe-II-NTA/H2O2-Mn system were typically 7-9-fold larger than those obtained in Fe-III-NTA/H2O2 system. The involved reactions in Fe-III-NTA/H2O2-Mn system were proposed on the basis of important parameters analysis including ferrous ion concentration, dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, and the quenching experiments for hydroxyl radial (HO') and superoxide anion radical (O-2(.-)). Several intermediates have been identified by mass spectrometry. Our results suggest that the degradation of metoprolol in both Fe-III-NTA/H2O2 and Fe-III-NTA/H2O2-Mn systems were caused by HO. attack. The degradation pathways of metoprolol were proposed on the basis of the identified intermediates. Fe-III-NTA/H2O2-Mn system led to more efficient degradation of metoprolol and its intermediates. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据