4.8 Article

Optical Signatures of Quantum Emitters in Suspended Hexagonal Boron Nitride

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 3328-3336

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b00665

关键词

hexagonal boron nitride; single-photon source; fluorescent defect; single crystal; dipole lattice coupling; Huang-Rhys factor

资金

  1. Army Research Office [W911NF-15-1-0589]
  2. NSF MRSEC [DMR-1120901]
  3. Research Council of Lithuania [M-ERA.NET-1/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) is rapidly emerging as an attractive material for solid-state quantum engineering. Analogously to three-dimensional wide-band gap semiconductors such as diamond, h-BN hosts isolated defects exhibiting-visible fluorescence at room temperature, and the ability to position such quantum emitters within a two-dimensional material promises breakthrough advances in quantum sensing, photonics, and other quantum technologies. Critical to such applications is an understanding of the physics underlying h-BN's quantum emission. We report the creation and characterization of visible single-photon sources in suspended, single-crystal, h-BN films. With substrate interactions eliminated, we study the spectral, temporal, and spatial characteristics of the defects' optical emission. Theoretical analysis of the defects' spectra reveals similarities in vibronic coupling to h-BN phonon modes despite widely varying fluorescence wavelengths, and a statistical analysis of the polarized emission from many emitters throughout the same single-crystal flake uncovers a weak correlation between the optical dipole orientations of some defects and h-BN's primitive crystallographic axes, despite a clear misalignment for other dipoles. These measurements constrain possible defect models and, moreover, suggest that several classes of emitters can exist simultaneously throughout free-standing h-BN, whether they be different defects, different charge states of the same defect, or the result of strong local perturbations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据