4.4 Article

Development and evaluation of a biomass increment based index for site productivity

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 400-410

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0330

关键词

productivity; mixed species; site index; Acadian Forest Region; biomass growth

类别

资金

  1. University of Maine Cooperative Forest Research Unit, Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station, New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources (NBDNR)
  2. Prince Edward Island Department of Forestry, Fish and Wildlife (PEIFFW)
  3. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1361543] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measures of forest productivity generally rely on site index, which can be problematic for multicohort and mixed-species stands. Using stand growth and dominant tree height-age (i.e., site tree) measurements from similar to 10 900 plot locations from Maine, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island, a forest productivity model for the Acadian Forest Region was developed as a function of climate, lithology, soils, and topographic metrics. Approximately 65% of variation in observed aboveground dry-biomass growth rate (BG) was explained by a Chapman-Richards function of temperature, bedrock, soil root space, slope, and depth to water in combination with stand structure and species predictors. Productivity was then defined in terms of the predicted asymptote of BG, holding structure and species constant, which was termed biomass growth index (BGI), i.e., the site-influenced component of the BG relationship. BGI was mapped on a 20 m grid throughout the region. BGI explained 0%-30% of the variability in spruce (Picea sp.) and balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) site index and had similar site index predictive performance (+/- 5%) when compared with existing land productivity classifications in each province. BGI provides a direct relationship between site variables and growth and can help guide forest management decisions and future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据