3.8 Article

Temporary Safety Hazards

期刊

NOUS
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 152-174

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nous.12104

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Epistemic Objection says that certain theories of time (like the growing block and moving spotlight) imply that it is impossible to know which time is absolutely present. Standard presentations of the Epistemic Objection are elliptical-and some of the most natural premises one might fill in to complete the argument end up leading to radical skepticism. But there is a way of filling in the details which avoids this problem, using epistemic safety. The new version has two interesting upshots. First, while Ross Cameron alleges that the Epistemic Objection applies to presentism as much as to theories like the growing block, the safety version does not overgeneralize this way. Second, the Epistemic Objection does generalize in a different, overlooked way. The safety objection is a serious problem for a widely held combination of views: propositional temporalism (objects of belief change truth-value) together with metaphysical eternalism (the world does not objectively privilege any particular time).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据