4.1 Article

Systemic and individual factors in the buprenorphine treatment-seeking process: a qualitative study

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13011-016-0085-y

关键词

Medication-assisted treatment; Qualitative research; Opioid use; Treatment-seeking; Policy

资金

  1. Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority [5723]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Opioid use is a significant problem in Alaska. Medication-assisted treatment for opioid use, including buprenorphine, reduces withdrawal symptoms and the harm associated with opioid abuse. Understanding consumers' treatment-seeking process is important for addressing barriers to treatment, facilitating effective service utilization, and informing policy. Methods: To understand treatment-seeking behavior, we examined the attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge of those who would benefit from the medication-assisted treatment (MAT) buprenorphine. Qualitative data from 2 focus groups (each including 4 participants) and 3 in-depth interviews with people who have used or considered using buprenorphine in treatment for an opioid use disorder were analyzed using grounded theory and directed content analysis approaches. Results: Key findings suggest that individual (withdrawal process, individual motivation) and systemic (sociocultural, political, societal values) factors frame the treatment seeking process. Participants' progress on the treatmentseeking road was affected by models of addiction and MAT, which related to facilitators and barriers encountered in seeking treatment (e. g. support, resources, treatment structure). These factors shaped the longer-term road to recovery, which was seen as on ongoing process. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest it is crucial for interventionists to take a contextual approach that considers individual and systemic factors involved in opioid addiction, treatment, and recovery. This study highlights ways policy makers and treatment providers can address the barriers consumers face in their treatmentseeking process in order to increase treatment access.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据