4.8 Article

Functional and structural insight into properdin control of complement alternative pathway amplification

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 1084-1099

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201696173

关键词

alternative pathway; complement; deficiency; properdin; structure

资金

  1. Lundbeck foundation centers LUNA and BRAINSTRUC, Danscatt [R155-2015-2666]
  2. Danish Research Council for Independent Research [1323-00107B, 4181-00137B]
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation [12261]
  4. French National Research Agency [ANR-15-CE15-0001, ANR PRC-C3G 2016-2019R]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-15-CE15-0001] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  6. Lundbeck Foundation [R155-2015-2666] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF16OC0022058] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Properdin (FP) is an essential positive regulator of the complement alternative pathway (AP) providing stabilization of the C3 and C5 convertases, but its oligomeric nature challenges structural analysis. We describe here a novel FP deficiency (E244K) caused by a single point mutation which results in a very low level of AP activity. Recombinant FP E244K is monomeric, fails to support bacteriolysis, and binds weakly to C3 products. We compare this to a monomeric unit excised from oligomeric FP, which is also dysfunctional in bacteriolysis but binds the AP proconvertase, C3 convertase, C3 products and partially stabilizes the convertase. The crystal structure of such a FP-convertase complex suggests that the major contact between FP and the AP convertase is mediated by a single FP thrombospondin repeat and a small region in C3b. Small angle X-ray scattering indicates that FP E244K is trapped in a compact conformation preventing its oligomerization. Our studies demonstrate an essential role of FP oligomerization in vivo while our monomers enable detailed structural insight paving the way for novel modulators of complement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据