4.3 Article

Model-Based Evaluation of Strategies to Control Brucellosis in China

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14030295

关键词

brucellosis; dynamic modeling; basic reproduction number; control strategy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11331009, 11671241, 11501338, 11601293]
  2. Graduate Students' Excellent Innovative Item of Shanxi Province [2015BY01]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province [201601D021002]
  4. 131 Talents of Shanxi University
  5. Program for the Outstanding Innovative Teams (OIT) of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brucellosis, the most common zoonotic disease worldwide, represents a great threat to animal husbandry with the potential to cause enormous economic losses. Brucellosis has become a major public health problem in China, and the number of human brucellosis cases has increased dramatically in recent years. In order to evaluate different intervention strategies to curb brucellosis transmission in China, a novel mathematical model with a general indirect transmission incidence rate was presented. By comparing the results of three models using national human disease data and 11 provinces with high case numbers, the best fitted model with standard incidence was used to investigate the potential for future outbreaks. Estimated basic reproduction numbers were highly heterogeneous, varying widely among provinces. The local basic reproduction numbers of provinces with an obvious increase in incidence were much larger than the average for the country as a whole, suggesting that environment-to-individual transmission was more common than individual-to-individual transmission. We concluded that brucellosis can be controlled through increasing animal vaccination rates, environment disinfection frequency, or elimination rates of infected animals. Our finding suggests that a combination of animal vaccination, environment disinfection, and elimination of infected animals will be necessary to ensure cost-effective control for brucellosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据