4.7 Article

Particulate capture efficiency of a vegetative environmental buffer surrounding an animal feeding operation

期刊

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 101-108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.006

关键词

Vegetative environmental buffer; Shelterbelt; Particulate; Lidar; Emissions; Animal feeding operation

资金

  1. USDA NRCS Conservation Innovation Grant Program [69-3A75-12-244]
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project [OKL02882]
  3. University of Delaware
  4. Oklahoma State University
  5. University of Maryland
  6. USDA-ARS intramural funding [58-5030-5-899, 3096-66000-003-00, 5030-11610-002-00, 5030-31000-005-00, 804231000-005-00, 8042-12610-002-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particulate matter emitted from tunnel-ventilated animal feeding operations (AFOs) is known to transport malodorous compounds. As a mitigation strategy, vegetative environmental buffers (VEBs) are often installed surrounding AFOs to capture particulates and induce lofting and dispersion. Currently, point measurements are the primary means by which VEB performance has been investigated. The existing techniques lack spatial and temporal resolution and fail to assign the observed particulate reduction to capture, lofting, or dispersion. This study presents a technique for estimating the capture efficiency of a VEB using lidar and attributes all observed reduction to particulate capture, thereby delineating the effects of capture and lofting. The experiments revealed a capture efficiency ranging from 21 to 74%. Instantaneous lidar scans showed periodic lofting well above the VEB, but when scans were averaged over several hours, the plumes appeared Gaussian. This paper documents experimental evidence quantifying the capture efficiency of a VEB. It also establishes an experimental framework for future studies on the efficacy of various emissions mitigation strategies. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据