4.8 Article

Capacitive sensing of N-formylamphetamine based on immobilized molecular imprinted polymers

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 741-747

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.083

关键词

Capacitive biosensor; Molecular imprinted polymers; N-formylamphetamine; Water analysis

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [653626]
  2. CapSenze Biosystems
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [653626] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly sensitive, capacitive biosensor was developed to monitor trace amounts of an amphetamine precursor in aqueous samples. The sensing element is a gold electrode with molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs) immobilized on its surface. A continuous-flow system with timed injections was used to simulate flowing waterways, such as sewers, springs, rivers, etc., ensuring wide applicability of the developed product. MIPs, implemented as a recognition element due to their stability under harsh environmental conditions, were synthesized using thermo-and UV-initiated polymerization techniques. The obtained particles were compared against commercially.,available MIPs according to specificity and selectivity metrics; commercial MIPs were characterized by quite broad cross-reactivity to other structurally related amphetamine-type stimulants. After the best batch of MIPs was chosen, different strategies for immobilizing them on the gold electrode's surface were evaluated, and their stability was also verified. The complete, developed system was validated through analysis of spiked samples. The limit of detection (LOD) for N-formylamphetamine was determined to be 10 mu M in this capacitive biosensor system. The obtained results indicate future possible applications of this MIPs-based capacitive biosensor for environmental and forensic analysis. To the best of our knowledge there are no existing MIPs-based sensors toward amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据