4.2 Article

Mild Cognitive Impairment is Associated With White Matter Integrity Changes in Late-Myelinating Regions Within the Corpus Callosum

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1533317515578257

关键词

diffusion tensor imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; mild cognitive impairment; corpus callosum; Alzheimer's disease

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. Veterans Health Administration
  3. VISN 1 Career Development Award
  4. Gilbert Foundation/AFAR
  5. Medical Research Service VA Merit Review Awards
  6. Veterans Affairs Clinical Science R&D Career Development Award [1IK2CX000706-01A2]
  7. National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke [K23NS062148]
  8. National Institute of Nursing Research [R01NR010827]
  9. National Institute on Aging [P60AG08812, P01AG004390]
  10. Research Council of Norway [204966/F20]
  11. National Institute on Drug Abuse [2T32DA015036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Degenerative brain changes in Alzheimer's disease may occur in reverse order of normal brain development based on the retrogenesis model. This study tested whether evidence of reverse myelination was observed in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) using a data-driven analytic approach based on life span developmental data. Whole-brain high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging scans were obtained for 31 patients with MCI and 79 demographically matched healthy older adults. Comparisons across corpus callosum (CC) regions of interest (ROIs) showed decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) in the body but not in the genu or splenium; early-, middle-, and late-myelinating ROIs restricted to the CC revealed decreased FA in late- but not early- or middle-myelinating ROIs. Voxelwise group differences revealed areas of lower FA in MCI, but whole-brain differences were equally distributed across early-, middle-, and late-myelinating regions. Overall, results within the CC support the retrogenesis model, although caution is needed when generalizing these results beyond the CC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据