4.4 Article

Quantitative assessment of soil CO2 concentration and stable carbon isotope for leakage detection at geological carbon sequestration sites

期刊

GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 680-691

出版社

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1679

关键词

geological carbon sequestration; CO2 leakage detection; CO2 concentration; stable carbon isotope; numerical modeling

资金

  1. US DOE-SBIR [DE-SC0011282]
  2. National Scientific Foundation of China (NSFC) [41371052, U1203282]
  3. Chinese Ministry of Water Resources' special funds for scientific research on public causes [20151059]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0011282] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a quantitative method to evaluate CO2 concentration ([CO2]) and stable carbon isotope ratio (delta C-13) as indicators for leakage detection at a geological carbon sequestration site by combining use of field release tests and a numerical modeling approach. A numerical model was developed to simulate CO2 dynamics by considering diffusion, dissolution in soil water, and soil respiration. The numerical model fits the background dynamics of [CO2] (360 to 550 ppm) and delta C-13 (-16% to -6%) well and reproduces fairly the overall trend observed during the CO2 release test. The model was further applied to assess detection probability (DP) of [CO2] and delta C-13 for leakage detection in terms of various factors, such as CO2 leakage rate, background variations, delta C-13 of the CO2 leaked, and the threshold value of signal-to-noise ratio. Modeling results suggest that delta C-13 may have a higher DP than [CO2]. This study also shows that DP of delta C-13 for the IEA Weyburn project is close to 0, implying delta C-13 is inappropriate to be an indicator for CO2 leakage at the site. The quantitative method developed can also be used to design a monitoring plan or strategy in a near-surface environment for geological carbon sequestration. (C) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据