4.4 Article

Interpretation of above-zone pressure influence time to characterize CO2 leakage

期刊

GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 1050-1064

出版社

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1698

关键词

CO2 leakage characterization; above-zone pressure interference; influence time; analytical approach

资金

  1. Louisiana Board of Regents [43950]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pressure transient analysis has long been used to characterize underground geological formations. Pressure is monitored for evaluating the containment of injected CO2 in the target formations in CO2 geological storage. Pressure interference testing in a permeable zone overlying the storage zone can determine migration of CO2 from the target reservoir. This study focuses on interpretation of interference tests in the above-zone to obtain information on the plume size from pressure influence time. We define a conceptual model with idealization of the CO2 leakage scenario into a 3-region linear composite system. For each region of this system, the governing pressure diffusivity equations and corresponding initial and boundary conditions are presented. An analytical solution is derived by sequentially transforming the equation system into Laplace and Fourier domains. The analytical solution is verified by comparing to numerical simulation results and a limiting analytical solution. Next, the ability of the analytical solution to predict the pressure influence time for an interference test is evaluated. It is shown that the pressure influence time is independent of the plume shape and depends only on the plume size on the line connecting the two interference test wells. This suggests that the measured pressure influence time can be inverted using our analytical solution to obtain the leaked plume size. The influence time is used for an example field application to obtain the plume volume percentage. (c) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据