4.6 Article

Self-doped TiO2 nanotube electrodes: A powerful tool as a sensor platform for electroanalytical applications

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 527-533

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.141

关键词

titanium dioxide; cathodic polarization; sensing platform; p-phenylenediamine oxidation; determination

资金

  1. Brazilian Research Agency-FAPESP [2014/03679-7, 2015/18109-4]
  2. Brazilian Research Agency-CNPq [153169/2014-1, 446245/2014-3]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [15/18109-4] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of TiO2 nanotube (TiO2NTs) electrodes as anodes without UV irradiation has been described herein for electroanalytical purposes. Although semiconductors of n-type, such as TiO2NTs, do not offer any potential electrochemical response at the anodic region, they can be activated once they are a priori subjected to a simple cathodic polarization (P-TiO2NTs) and used to follow the oxidation reaction without any other modification. The best polarization conditions were obtained at 0.1 mol L-1 KH2PO4 pH 10 at -2.5 V for 5 min, and the polarized TiO2 electrode was applied in the Fe(CN)(6)(4) redox probe oxidation and also p-phenylenediamine (PPD) determination as models of species which undergo oxidation. Following the optimization of the parameters, analytical curves for Fe(CN)(6)(4) and PPD were constructed in the range of 2.5 x 10(-5) to 5 x 10(-3) mol L-1 with a detection limit at 7.23 x 10(-6) mol L-1 and 0.500 to 98.6 x 10(-6) mol L-1 with a detection limit at 0.558 x 10(-7) mol L-1 using linear sweep voltammetry and linear sweep adsorptive stripping voltammetry techniques, respectively. Lastly, the figures of merit for PTiO2NT and conventional glassy carbon electrodes are compared. Our results show that P-TiO2NT electrodes can be used as an excellent platform for the development of electrochemical sensors. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据