4.4 Article

Protective effects of low-dose rosuvastatin on isoproterenol-induced chronic heart failure in rats by regulation of DDAH-ADMA-NO pathway

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/1755-5922.12241

关键词

ADMA; Chronic heart failure; DDAH; Isoproterenol; NO; Rosuvastatin

资金

  1. Ningxia Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China [NZ 16270]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsCardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death with high morbidity and mortality, and chronic heart failure is the terminal phase of it. This study aimed to investigate the protective effects of the low-dose rosuvastatin on isoproterenol-induced chronic heart failure and to explore the possible related mechanisms. MethodsMale Sprague Dawley rats were given isoproterenol 5mg/kg once a day for 7days to establish heart failure model by subcutaneous injection. Simultaneously, low-dose rosuvastatin (5mg/kg) was orally administrated from day 1 to day 14. Protective effects were evaluated by hemodynamic parameter, histopathological variables, serum asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), cardiac troponin I (cTnI), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and myocardial nitric oxide (NO), and the levels of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2 (DDAH2), arginine methyltransferases 1 (PRMT1) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression were analyzed. ResultsTherapeutic rosuvastatin (5mg/kg) significantly attenuated isoproterenol-induced hypertrophy, remodeling and dysfunction of ventricle, reduced the increased serum content of ADMA, cTnI, and BNP, and elevated myocardial NO in rats (P<.05). Besides, rosuvastatin also significantly inhibited fibrosis of myocardium, normalized the increased PRMT1 and decreased DDAH2 expression. ConclusionsLow-dose rosuvastatin exerted cardioprotective effects on isoproterenol-induced heart failure in rats by modulating DDAH-ADMA-NO pathway, and it may present the new therapeutic value in ameliorating chronic heart failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据