4.6 Article

The degenerate special Lagrangian equation

期刊

ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICS
卷 310, 期 -, 页码 889-939

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2017.02.008

关键词

Special Lagrangian; Degenerate elliptic PDE; Dirichlet problem for geodesic equation; Arnold conjecture; Viscosity solutions

资金

  1. BSF [2012236]
  2. NSF [DMS-1206284, 1515703]
  3. Sloan Research Fellowship
  4. ERC [337560]
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1515703] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [337560] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces the degenerate special Lagrangian equation (DSL) and develops the basic analytic tools to construct and study its solutions. The DSL governs geodesics in the space of positive graph Lagrangians in C-n. Existence of geodesics in the space of positive Lagrangians is an important step in a program for proving existence and uniqueness of special Lagrangians. Moreover, it would imply certain cases of the strong Arnold conjecture from Hamiltonian dynamics. We show the DSL is degenerate elliptic. We introduce a space time Lagrangian angle for one-parameter families of graph Lagrangians, and construct its regularized lift. The superlevel sets of the regularized lift define subequations for the DSL in the sense of Harvey-Lawson. We extend the existence theory of Harvey-Lawson for subequations to the setting of domains with corners, and thus obtain solutions to the Dirichlet problem for the DSL in all branches. Moreover, we introduce the calibration measure, which plays a role similar to that of the Monge Ampere measure in convex and complex geometry. The existence of this measure and regularity estimates allow us to prove that the solutions we obtain in the outer branches of the DSL have a well-defined length in the space of positive Lagrangians. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据