4.7 Review

Red Blood Cell Function and Dysfunction: Redox Regulation, Nitric Oxide Metabolism, Anemia

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 26, 期 13, 页码 718-742

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2016.6954

关键词

red blood cells; nitric oxide; anemia; RBC deformability; hemolysis; cardiovascular disease; red cell eNOS

资金

  1. German Research Council (DFG) [1902, CO 1305/2-1]
  2. Susanne-Bunnenberg-Stiftung of the Dusseldorf Heart Center
  3. National Institutes of Health (USA) [HL0088554]
  4. American Heart Association Grant [16PRE31180040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significance: Recent clinical evidence identified anemia to be correlated with severe complications of cardiovascular disease (CVD) such as bleeding, thromboembolic events, stroke, hypertension, arrhythmias, and inflammation, particularly in elderly patients. The underlying mechanisms of these complications are largely unidentified. Recent Advances: Previously, red blood cells (RBCs) were considered exclusively as transporters of oxygen and nutrients to the tissues. More recent experimental evidence indicates that RBCs are important interorgan communication systems with additional functions, including participation in control of systemic nitric oxide metabolism, redox regulation, blood rheology, and viscosity. In this article, we aim to revise and discuss the potential impact of these noncanonical functions of RBCs and their dysfunction in the cardiovascular system and in anemia. Critical Issues: The mechanistic links between changes of RBC functional properties and cardiovascular complications related to anemia have not been untangled so far. Future Directions: To allow a better understanding of the complications associated with anemia in CVD, basic and translational science studies should be focused on identifying the role of noncanonical functions of RBCs in the cardiovascular system and on defining intrinsic and/or systemic dysfunction of RBCs in anemia and its relationship to CVD both in animal models and clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据