4.5 Article

Prolonged central circulation transit time in patients with HFpEF and HFrEF by magnetic resonance imaging

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jex051

关键词

heart failure; HFrEF; HFpEF; MRI; circulation transit time; haemodynamics

资金

  1. St Francis Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Prolonged central circulation transit time (TT) has long been associated with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. In this study, we assessed the central circulation TT using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with HF of preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and of reduced EF (HFrEF) and investigated its relation to haemodynamics. Methods and results Fifty eight prospectively recruited volunteers underwent CMR. TT was taken as the time between the peaks of time-intensity curves from first pass perfusion images and normalized to cardiac cycle length intervals. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 55 +/- 3%, 57 +/- 7%, and 28 +/- 10% in control (N = 10), HFpEF (N = 20), and HFrEF (N = 28), respectively (P < 0.001). Global central TT from right atrium to ascending aorta was significantly prolonged in patients with HFrEF [17 +/- 5 cardiac cycles (cc)] and HFpEF (12 +/- 3 cc) when compared to the normal controls (8 +/- 1 cc) (P < 0.001). Regional TT was also prolonged in HF patients between right atrium and pulmonary artery (PA), PA and left atrium (LA), and LA and ascending aorta (all P-value < 0.001) with the longest delay seen between PA and LA. Among 48 HF patients, 28 underwent same day cardiac catheterization. Multivariate regression analysis suggested while reduced left and right ventricular EF were the strongest correlates for HFrEF increased pulmonary capillary wedge (PCWP) and reduced PA oxygen saturation were the strongest correlates for HFpEF. Conclusions Global and regional central TT can be assessed in the first pass perfusion imaging. Prolonged normalized global TT correlates with reduced EF in HFrEF and increased PCWP in HFpEF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据