4.5 Article

Fifty important research questions in microbial ecology

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
卷 93, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fix044

关键词

environmental processes; evolutionary processes; functional diversity; host-microbiome interactions; priority setting; research agenda

资金

  1. British Ecological Society
  2. University of Salford
  3. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  4. Colciencias
  5. Earth and Life Systems Alliance
  6. Arcadia
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/P023444/1, BB/F004311/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. BBSRC [BB/F004311/1, BB/P023444/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. NERC [NE/P013708/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial ecology provides insights into the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of microbial communities underpinning every ecosystem on Earth. Microbial communities can now be investigated in unprecedented detail, although there is still a wealth of open questions to be tackled. Here we identify 50 research questions of fundamental importance to the science or application of microbial ecology, with the intention of summarising the field and bringing focus to new research avenues. Questions are categorised into seven themes: host-microbiome interactions; health and infectious diseases; human health and food security; microbial ecology in a changing world; environmental processes; functional diversity; and evolutionary processes. Many questions recognise that microbes provide an extraordinary array of functional diversity that can be harnessed to solve real-world problems. Our limited knowledge of spatial and temporal variation in microbial diversity and function is also reflected, as is the need to integrate micro- and macro-ecological concepts, and knowledge derived from studies with humans and other diverse organisms. Although not exhaustive, the questions presented are intended to stimulate discussion and provide focus for researchers, funders and policy makers, informing the future research agenda in microbial ecology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据